Oct 20, 2025

Collection of Favorite Quotes







Favorite Quotes

**Theodore Roosevelt:**

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."


**Henry David Thoreau:**

"If one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours."


**Oscar Wilde:**

"Never love anyone who treats you like you're ordinary."


**Epictetus:**

"You cannot learn that which you think you already know."


**John Greenleaf Whittier:**

"For of all sad words of tongue or pen, The saddest are these: 'It might have been!'"


**Jerzy Gregorek:**

"Easy choices, hard life. Hard choices, easy life."


**Mark Twain:**

"Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that, but the really great make you feel that you, too, can become great."


**John Green:**

"I fell in love the way you fall asleep: slowly, and then all at once."


**John D. Rockefeller:**

"A friendship founded on business is better than a business founded on friendship."


**Alexis de Tocqueville:**

"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money."


**Voltaire:**

"If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him."


**Donald Winnicott:**

"The catastrophe you fear will happen has in fact already happened."


**Hunter S. Thompson:**

"Let us toast to animal pleasures, to escapism, to rain on the roof and instant coffee, to unemployment insurance and library cards, to absinthe and good-hearted landlords, to music and warm bodies and contraceptives... and to the 'good life', whatever it is and wherever it happens to be."


**Charles Bukowski:**

"For those who believe in God, most of the big questions are answered. But for those of us who can't readily accept the God formula, the big answers don't remain stone-written. We adjust to new conditions and discoveries. We are pliable. Love need not be a command nor faith a dictum. I am my own god. We are here to unlearn the teachings of the church, state, and our educational system. We are here to drink beer. We are here to kill war. We are here to laugh at the odds and live our lives so well that Death will tremble to take us."


**Jim Hayes:**

"An old friend will help you move. A good friend will help you move a dead body."


**Stephen King:**

"When his life was ruined, his family killed, his farm destroyed, Job knelt down on the ground and yelled up to the heavens, 'Why god? Why me?' and the thundering voice of God answered: 'There's just something about you that pisses me off.'"


**George Carlin:**

"Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever 'til the end of time! But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He's all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, but somehow just can't handle money!"


**Dave Evans:**

"You can’t solve a problem you’re not willing to have."


**James Clear:**

"Habits can be the compound interest of self-improvement."


**E.L. Doctorow:**

"Writing is like driving at night in the fog. You can only see as far as your headlights, but you can make the whole trip that way."


**Winston S. Churchill:**

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."


**John Adams:**

"The happiness of society is the end of government,"




Sep 12, 2020

Huge Idea from Yuval Hariri


 

Another hugely important idea from one of our greatest contemporary intellectuals. We may find ourselves nostalgic for the comparatively simple time when wealth and resources were the primary distinction between classes.

Despite being a longtime proponent of transhumanist technologies, it's impossible to ignore the enormous risk and friction they'll likely impose on society:



Aug 22, 2020

The Best Toy my Pomeranian's Ever Had!

I'm pretty late to the having dogs game, and still have a lot to learn. That said, I've put a lot into finding better and better toys for my Pomeranian, Winston Wigglesworth. This newest toy, which I customized a bit, is by far his favorite ever! We've played many many hours over months now, and he's as excited about it today as he was when we first got it...actually, more, WAY MORE! At first I think he was a bit afraid of it. I remember trying to obscure the pole from his view (which is funny in retrospect).

To my knowledge dogs are the only animal in the world that'll look in the direction you point or gesture. (Even chimpanzees will stare at you blindly while you furiously point at something.) 

Then there's this stupid toy with its 3 components: pole, cord, and toy. Winston's walnut sized brain appears wholly incapable of making the connection between them. That means every time I reach for the pole, his toy comes magically to life. He completely loses his mind with excitement, then chase the thing for 10+ minutes before it slithers back into the closet it lives in. We usually have a few of these sessions a day.





My previous gf had two Pomeranians and those guys lived their entire lives having never engaged in play like this. Knowing what I know now I think that's a terrible shame! It's also the main reason behind this post. If you're interested in learning more about this or any of the other toys we've tried along the way, it'd be my pleasure to try and help you bring more happiness into your dog's life!


Apr 8, 2020

Are We Too Busy Dying from Coronavirus to Die From Anything Else?

Estimates of up to 2 million deaths in the United States, mortality rates trending at 3%, and new infections growing rapidly into March were enough to bring much of the country to a grinding halt. 

Kinsa's new Health Weather Map
Recent predictions however are trending dramatically lower, with 70k-100k deaths anticipated this year. This could be evidence of the power in social distancing, but could also speak to a much less lethal disease than originally feared. If there’s any merit to the idea I’m about to share, then we’ll see mortality rates driven dramatically lower still.

Until we better understand the true number of infected, we won’t a know the actual infected fatality rate (IFR) for coronavirus; but with an estimated 85% of coronavirus-positive patients believed to suffer mild (or no symptoms at all), it’s possible there’s an already huge number of overall infected coronavirus patient pool that’ll radically reduce the current trending mortality rate of ~3%.

There’s another factor, however, one that could lower mortality rates even further, and as we move into April, it’s receiving effectively zero press attention. It has to do with how we’re classifying coronavirus fatalities in patients with already deadly diseases (“comorbidities” such as advanced cardiovascular and respiratory disease).  

Given roughly 94% of coronavirus deaths are in patients with an already potentially deadly disease [UPDATED LINK], how we report underlying causes of death in coronavirus-positive patients is hugely consequential and, as presently organized, is hugely flawed.

The United States relies on the “NVSS” (National Vital Statistics System) to set standards for the designation and reporting of underlying cause of death nationwide. Such data is aggregated and, together, forms the basis for determining mortality rates for the things that kill us. The NVSS is managed by the CDC, and serves as a model for similar agencies and reporting systems around the world.

In the context of coronavirus fatality reporting, their standards may be contributing a unique and potentially enormous vulnerability in the way we consider coronavirus’ potential for harm. It all has to do with a fairly inane seeming detail around how we attribute fatality reporting: by that I mean, we pair each death with a single, primary underlying cause.

Causes of death USA 2017
Said another way, our national fatality reporting system has a single-attribution bias. When we die, a coroner or medical examiner will list one, single underlying cause of death as the cause; even in instances where comorbidities played a strong (even dominant) contributory role in killing us. 

By it's very nature, a single-cause biased system cannot account adequately for the contributions coexisting diseases play. But for all its flaws, the system worked well-enough in peacetime. Today however, the system seems wildly unfit to help us understand a virus whose very lethality all but requires deadly preexisting comorbidities be present.

The coronavirus data being acted on is noisy, the stakes are high, so radical action may ultimately be justifiable. However, the relative softness of certain key variables (like the number of actual infections vs test-confirmed cases) alone are enough to haunt policymakers. Nobody paying attention would be surprised to see mortality rates drop dramatically owing to that factor alone. Now layer-in the structural flaw in how we’re counting coronavirus fatalities at the most fundamental level, it’s not hard to imagine coronavirus approaching the proverbial “n word” of comparisons: “flu like mortality”

What might that look like on paper? If it turns out the number of infected are exponentially higher than confirmed cases (which isn’t hard to imagine given coronavirus manifests as with light or no symptoms in 85% of those infected), and if we controlled for the single cause of death attribution bias, we could see the mortality rate go from 3% to as low as .12%.



The bias is real. The overwhelming super-majority of fatalities from coronavirus are in patients with preexisting, often deadly underlying conditions.

I’m suggesting we stay vigilant to the possibility we're so busy dying from coronavirus we forget to notice we’re not dying from everything else.


April 7, 2018




Supplemental Thoughts:

As of last week, the National Vital Statistics System issued guidance that instructed Medical Examiners and Coroners nationwide to identify Coronavirus disease deaths using the ICD–10 code “U07.1”. Specifically, “Deaths are coded to U07.1 when coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19 are reported as a cause that contributed to death on the death certificate. These can include laboratory confirmed cases, as well as cases without laboratory confirmation. If the certifier suspects COVID-19 or determines it was likely (e.g., the circumstances were compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), they can report COVID-19 as “probable” or “presumed” on the death certificate.”

That means deaths from coronavirus needn’t be confirmed with testing to be counted.

For context, roughly 2.8mm people die in the United States every year (about 65mm globally). Each death is assigned a primary underlying cause of death and made available to various stakeholders, from government to media.

My concern has to do with our single-attribution-minded model for classifying underlying cause of death in coronavirus fatalities. Specifically, I haven’t been able to determine if medical examiners and coroners are controlling for possible bias in attributing fatalities to coronavirus when there are one or more comorbidities present (as is the case in ~94% of coronavirus fatalities). 

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Every year it claims roughly 650k Americans. The fourth leading cause (behind cancer and accidents) are chronic respiratory diseases. They kill 160k Americans. Coronavirus requires the presence of those deadly diseases (or similarly deadly comorbidities such as cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, and pneumonia), to kill 95% of the time. It’s well established that coronavirus exacerbates both chronic respiratory and underlying cardiovascular illness, and while the data isn’t yet in, we’ll almost certainly see a significant drop in fatalities from the typical leading causes of death. How big a drop is the $20 trillion dollar question.

The New York Times recently wrote a story entitled “Where Have All the Heart Attacks Gone?”.  

While ~85% of heart attack patients typically go home, 10-15% don’t (roughly 647,000 per year). It’s a grim reality that coronavirus patients predisposed to heart attacks are more likely to suffer a fatal heart attack. 

Similarly, stroke specialists in New Orleans, Chicago, Seattle, report seeing stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patient counts down 30% to as much as 50%. Fear of exposure to coronavirus at hospital, could be a contributing factor, but doesn’t explain a similar reduction in patients being experienced in telestroke and virtual care networks.

It seems a distinct possibility that coronavirus may hastening death in a significant number (or even a majority) of patients who would otherwise die this year.



Supplemental Resources and Reporting Tools:

Here are some of the data I regularly consult, as well some interesting articles and useful reporting technology.

Primary sources of data for new infections/fatalities:



New reporting technology that uses anonymized data from cell phones to score actual compliance with social distancing by area:



Unacast Social Distancing Scoreboard
Two articles: the first concerns likelihood that fatality rates are exaggerated by an order of magnitude. The other is a revised estimate from the same Imperial College scientist who scared the s*** out of the world a week ago with estimates of millions dead (now down to 20k or a few thousand in the UK). His last estimate won the Imperial College a $10mm grant from UK gov't.



At minute 38:40 in this podcast Marshall Burke, an assistant professor at Stanford's Department of Earth System Science, says the better air quality caused by shutdown in China will likely save 50,000 lives in China”:

(It’s worth noting those are just the impacts from temporary suspension of pollution activity.  They exclude reduction in traffic fatalities, reduction in other communicable disease fatalities from isolation measures, etc.) The main takeaway being this: running our world, as it is today, costs a lot of lives.

Here's a similar article:

And here are assumptions and a forecast on the pandemic from HealthData (interestingly, I noticed they revised their death forecast down..I have screenshot one forecast pre-revision...no law says you can't revise, but seems a bit shady to not account publicly for errors)


And lastly, here's a very cool utility that uses millions of anonymized IoT thermometer readings to create a national "health weather map":





May 28, 2019

The Best New Senolytic Isn't a Drug...or New For That Matter.

In the last 20 years I've spent an ungodly sum of money on the most promising anti-aging treatments available.  From visits to Ray Kurzweil and Dr. Terry Grossman's Colorado longevity clinic, consults with leading longevity experts, and dozens of different supplements, pharmaceuticals, therapies, and treatments; I've tried them all.  However promising, I continue to take only a handful of the hundreds of longevity remedies I've tested.


In the past I've been really enthusiastic about a few developments (and I continue to be confident in metformin, rapamycin, and telomerase activators), but never once have I written about any of them.  That is, until now.

I'm writing today because I've found an anti-aging treatment that may not only slow, but in some ways reverse the effects aging.  What's more incredible: this treatment is already available, cheap, and likely very safe (probably side effect free).

The treatment?  It's a flavonoid called fisetin.

If you're like me, you're immediately prejudice to the idea that a food derivative (derived from fruit, like strawberries) could do anything to actually move the line in slowing or reversing some of aging's deleterious effects.  You probably figure, as you should, that if it was effective, we'd have figured it out long ago.

That sort of thinking is almost always right.  In this instance, however, it looks like most everyone (of the very few who've taken fisetin with any discipline) were taking far too small a dose to experience any of its anti-aging benefits.

I'll come back to that.

For those interested, fisetin works as a "senolytic", meaning it works to induce death in senescent cells.

A senescent cell is one that's stopped dividing but hasn't undergone apoptosis (programmed cell death).  These zombie-like cells accumulate throughout our body as we age, and secrete toxic, proinflammatory signals that kill nearby cells.  More senescent cells create more senescent cells; a vicious cycle that's believed to contribute significantly to aging.

The understanding of how senescent cells contribute to aging is still relatively new, but it's already mobilized an enormous amount of capital and effort in the pharmaceutical space among those who wish to be the first to discover an effective senotherapeutic compound.

More intriguing is the recently discovered possibility that nature may have beaten pharma to it.  By that I mean, until just a handful of months ago, the most promising senolytic candidates were drugs (with the leading candidate being a combination of the chemotherapeutic drug dasatinib and the supplement quercetin (D+Q).  Then, around early 2019, two significant discoveries were published.  One was a landmark study that trialed many different potential senolytics in animals and found them to meaningfully increase both lifespan and healthspan.  The other was the first ever drug trial of senolytics on humans.  In the human trial, the University of Texas tested D+Q and found it to work substantially better than the best available treatments for the deadly age-related disease idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Even more intriguing was this study which trialed a number of senolytic candidates against D+Q.

The study in animals confirmed that senotherapeutics increased health and lifespan, but, more significantly, that the flavonoid fisetin was better than the most promising senolytic dasatinib + quercetin, but at (human equivalent) doses roughly 10X higher than the standard doses available for fisetin.

I'm pressed for time but have been meaning to get this information out there.  I'll circle back soon to fill in more detail around dosage and frequency (the prevailing belief is that a high-dose cycle of fisetin need not be daily, but instead should be ~5-day short-course therapies once every 3-5 months or so.  Until then, feel free to share any thoughts or questions you may have below.

Christian Hunter

Jul 1, 2018

3 Amazing Nootropics, and 4 Really Good Ones


I've invested a ridiculous amount of time and money exploring, obtaining, and personally testing many dozen substances and protocols in the nootropics and longevity spare.  I'm writing this post to share what I've learned, and perhaps turn you on to some options you didn't know were available.



One of my two overflowing supplement cabinets
First, here's the headline takeaway: Most (and I mean a good majority) of what's marketed today to improve cognition is useless.  Now it's worth noting that while useless, the great majority those substances aren't harmful either.

And it's not all bad news.  In fact, the reason I'm updating this post is because, just in the last few years, a few nootropic options have proven themselves to be effective, reliable, and generally safe.

By "effective" I should clarify that each "effective" nootropic option I'm aware of offers a fairly narrow scope of benefit.  Meaning, none have been able to improve overall cognition (as many claim) but instead, offer benefits to one or more of the many different components that broadly makeup cognition.

With that said, below you'll find a list of the most effective nootropics currently available today, divided into two groups.  The first group are the most effective nootropics I'm aware of, the second are the most effective cognitive enhancers.  There's a difference I won't get into unless asked.  So for now, here then are the most effective nootropics:
Melatonin might seem a bit unrelated, but I offer it as an option because few substances can do more to improve your overall health and cognition than getting regular and restorative sleep.

Now for those who looking for more hard hitting and immediate cognitive improvements (such as those looking to substitute their Adderall or Ritalin prescriptions with a safer alternative) and are willing to risk the uncertainty that attends less-proven options (and/or are willing to take a prescription) here’s the second list:

  • Tianeptine
Only the first drug (provigil) in the above list requires a prescription.  The rest are presently legal, and capable of provoking an immediate and noticeable effect (with very little to no loading required, as is common with many of the slower acting nootropics). Also, each of those cognitive enhancement options offer a unique method of action from the other (in how they support improved mood and/or thinking).

A warning: Some of the options listed above carry a risk of tolerance and addiction.  With that in mind, as with any drug, treatment, or supplement, it’s critical you seek the advice of a doctor before taking any of them.

I hope you found this update helpful.  Feel free to post a comment or question below.

Thanks, 

Austin, TX

Mar 24, 2015

Rank Theory and The Evolutionary Cause of Depression

Some time ago I became fascinated with the physical ravages of depression on the mind and the body which, in addition to the more popularly understood psychological trauma caused, will often leave the depressed in a state of perpetual illness, thoroughly fatigued, and – as recent research has found – even smaller brained!

Depression doesn't play the helpful evolutionary role it once did!
Despite the extraordinary resources marshaled at every level of society to combat depression, it still left me questioning why do we get depressed to begin with?

More specifically, what role, if any, has depression played in human evolutionary development?  Is depression the psychological equivalent of the appendix, or could it possibly serve a defensible evolutionary purpose?

It's against that basic backdrop of curiosity that I came to learn of a fascinating body of work developed recently by Anthony Stevens and John Price, known as "Rank Theory".  Rank Theory proposes that there is in fact an evolutionary role for depression in humans.  In fact, they argue that depression is an involuntary and adaptive response to defeat (and loss of social rank) which has played a vital role in maintaining social order and helping insure survival.

The mechanics of Rank Theory state that in the aftermath of human conflict, the defeated are often subject to an automatic internal inhibitory response that set off a cascade of maladies.  Those include general fatigue, feelings of helplessness, disturbed sleep, and loss of confidence (among myriad other ailments); all typical characteristics of depression. 

Often called the "yielding subroutine", this inhibitory response has its uses: among them is in physically and psychologically discouraging the loser in a status conflict from re-challenging their opponent and suffering further injury, losing additional resources, being extricated from their group, or even losing their lives.

It could be said then that depression has played a key role in helping preserve the stability and competitive efficiency of human society in general.  A good thing to be sure.

One of the major advantages to a human living amongst his or her fellow humans is the safety the group confers from predators, which includes protection from other homo sapiens. Therefore living within a group became essential to humans for their very survival, as well as for access to resources, co-operative hunting of big game, and for reproductive success. 

A feeling of "belonging" has therefore become absolutely crucial to the physical and psychological well-being of an individual.  To become well-liked and to maintain a high rank within an organization or group are both exceptionally desirable states of being.  Alternatively, to see oneself as unpopular and without social desirability will unfailingly sponsor anxiety and unhappiness, and rejection altogether by ones group typically has devastating psychological (and eventual physical) consequences. 

It's with regard to these variables and by studying the correlation between ones relative psychological well-being and their social standing that grief and happiness, mania and depression, satisfaction and anxiety can be most cleanly recognized and understood.  And in taking that into consideration perhaps the implications of contemporary "defeat" (in its manifold forms) ought to be considered even more seriously and with greater concern for their potentially significant long-term implications on both our psychological and physical well-being.  After all, the conflicts we have today, while perhaps more frequent, are dramatically less significant in their impact and ultimate consequence to the health and longevity of the defeated.  Yet, it would seem, our brains, blocked perhaps by countless generations of social adaptation, have yet to get the memo. 

Rank Theory, if proven accurate, suggests to me a stronger and more pronounced interdiction at the earliest evidence of onset-depression to combat our antiquated physiological response to defeat.


Be well,

Christian Hunter
Austin, TX

Feb 28, 2015

A collection of Alexis de Tocqueville's greatest quotes and observations.



A Random Assemblage of Favorite Quotes and Excerpts from
Alexis de Tocqueville




Born under another sky, placed in the middle of an always-moving scene, himself driven by the irresistible torrent which sweeps along everything that surrounds him, the American has no time to tie himself to anything; he grows accustomed to naught but change, and concludes by viewing it as the natural state of man; he feels a need for it; even more, he loves it: for instability, instead of occurring to him in the form of disasters, seems to give birth to nothing around him but wonders...


The best laws cannot make a constitution work in spite of morals; morals can turn the worst laws to advantage. That is a commonplace truth, but one to which my studies are always bringing me back. It is the central point in my conception. I see it at the end of all my reflections.


I studied the Koran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. So far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.
Letter to Arthur de Gobineau, 22 October 1843


...while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.

"But one also finds in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to want to bring the strong down to their level, and which reduces men to preferring equality in servitude to inequality in freedom".


Despotism under a democracy could see "a multitude of men", uniformly alike, equal, "constantly circling for petty pleasures", unaware of fellow citizens, and subject to the will of a powerful state which exerted an "immense protective power".


On majority rule and mediocrity:
Beyond the eradication of old-world aristocracy, ordinary Americans also refused to defer to those possessing, as Tocqueville put it, superior talent and intelligence, and these natural elites could not enjoy much share in political power as a result. Ordinary Americans enjoyed too much power, claimed too great a voice in the public sphere, to defer to intellectual superiors. This culture promoted a relatively pronounced equality, Tocqueville argued, but the same mores and opinions that ensured such equality also promoted mediocrity. Those who possessed true virtue and talent were left with limited choices.

Tocqueville said that those with the most education and intelligence were left with two choices. They could join limited intellectual circles to explore the weighty and complex problems facing society, or they could use their superior talents to amass vast fortunes in the private sector. Tocqueville wrote that he did not know of any country where there was "less independence of mind, and true freedom of discussion, than in America".

He blamed the omnipotence of majority rule as a chief factor in stifling thinking: "The majority has enclosed thought within a formidable fence. A writer is free inside that area, but woe to the man who goes beyond it, not that he stands in fear of an inquisition, but he must face all kinds of unpleasantness in every day persecution. A career in politics is closed to him for he has offended the only power that holds the keys."  Tocqueville, in contrast to previous political thinkers, argued that a serious problem in political life was not that people were too strong, but that people were "too weak" and felt powerless; the danger is that people felt "swept up in something that they could not control", according to Kaplan's interpretation of Tocqueville.

The men sent to Virginia were seekers of gold, adventurers without resources and without character, whose turbulent and restless spirit endangered the infant colony ... Artisans and agriculturalists arrived afterwards...hardly in any respect above the level of the inferior classes in England. No lofty views, no spiritual conception presided over the foundation of these new settlements. The colony was scarcely established when slavery was introduced; this was the capital fact which was to exercise an immense influence on the character, the laws and the whole future of the South. Slavery...dishonors labor; it introduces idleness into society, and with idleness, ignorance and pride, luxury and distress. It enervates the powers of the mind and benumbs the activity of man. On this same English foundation there developed in the North very different characteristics.



In 1855, he wrote the following text published by Maria Weston Chapman in the Liberty Bell: Testimony against Slavery

I do not think it is for me, a foreigner, to indicate to the United States the time, the measures, or the men by whom Slavery shall be abolished.

Still, as the persevering enemy of despotism everywhere, and under all its forms, I am pained and astonished by the fact that the freest people in the world is, at the present time, almost the only one among civilized and Christian nations which yet maintains personal servitude; and this while serfdom itself is about disappearing, where it has not already disappeared, from the most degraded nations of Europe.

An old and sincere friend of America, I am uneasy at seeing Slavery retard her progress, tarnish her glory, furnish arms to her detractors, compromise the future career of the Union which is the guaranty of her safety and greatness, and point out beforehand to her, to all her enemies, the spot where they are to strike. As a man, too, I am moved at the spectacle of man's degradation by man, and I hope to see the day when the law will grant equal civil liberty to all the inhabitants of the same empire, as God accords the freedom of the will, without distinction, to the dwellers upon earth.


Recollections of Alexis de Tocqueville:
I have come across men of letters who have written history without taking part in public affairs, and politicians who have concerned themselves with producing events without thinking about them. I have observed that the first are always inclined to find general causes whereas the second, living in the midst of disconnected daily facts, are prone to imagine that everything is attributable to particular incidents, and that the wires they pull are the same as those that move the world. It is to be presumed that both are equally deceived.
p. 80

For the first time in sixty years, the priests, the old aristocracy and the people met in a common sentiment—a feeling of revenge, it is true, and not of affection ; but even that is a great thing in politics, where a community of hatred is almost always the foundation of friendships.
Alternative translation: In politics... shared hatreds are almost always the basis of friendships.
p. 96


In countries where associations are free, secret societies are unknown. In America there are factions, but no conspiracies.


Chapter XII.
A democratic government is the only one in which those who vote for a tax can escape the obligation to pay it.

Chapter XIII.
In America, conscription is unknown; men are enlisted for payment. Compulsory recruitment is so alien to the ideas and so foreign to the customs of the people of the United States that I doubt whether they would ever dare to introduce it into their law.

Chapter XIII.
The greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults.

Chapter XIII.
In the United States, except for slaves, servants and the destitute fed by townships, everyone has the vote and this is an indirect contributor to law-making. Anyone wishing to attack the law is thus reduced to adopting one of two obvious courses: they must either change the nation's opinion or trample its wishes under foot.

Chapter XIV.
An American cannot converse, but he can discuss, and his talk falls into a dissertation. He speaks to you as if he was addressing a meeting; and if he should chance to become warm in the discussion, he will say "Gentlemen" to the person with whom he is conversing.

Chapter XV-IXX
I know of no country in which there is so little independence of mind and real freedom of discussion as in America.

Chapter XV.
In America the majority raises formidable barriers around the liberty of opinion; within these barriers an author may write what he pleases, but woe to him if he goes beyond them.

Chapter XV.
Laws are always unstable unless they are founded on the manners of a nation; and manners are the only durable and resisting power in a people.

Chapter XVI.
In cities men cannot be prevented from concerting together, and from awakening a mutual excitement which prompts sudden and passionate resolutions. Cities may be looked upon as large assemblies, of which all the inhabitants are members; their populace exercises a prodigious influence upon the magistrates, and frequently executes its own wishes without their intervention.

VARIANT TRANSLATION: In towns it is impossible to prevent men from assembling, getting excited together and forming sudden passionate resolves. Towns are like great meeting houses with all the inhabitants as members. In them the people wield immense influence over their magistrates and often carry their desires into execution without intermediaries.


Chapter XVII.
If it be of the highest importance to man, as an individual, that his religion should be true, the case of society is not the same. Society has no future life to hope for or to fear; and provided the citizens profess a religion, the peculiar tenets of that religion are of very little importance to its interests.
Variant translation: Though it is very important for man as an individual that his religion should be true, that is not the case for society. Society has nothing to fear or hope from another life; what is most important for it is not that all citizens profess the true religion but that they should profess religion.

Chapter XVII.
The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and of liberty so intimately in their minds, that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other; and with them this conviction does not spring from that barren traditionary faith which seems to vegetate in the soul rather than to live.

I am obliged to confess that I do not regard the abolition of slavery as a means of warding off the struggle of the two races in the Southern states. The Negroes may long remain slaves without complaining; but if they are once raised to the level of freemen, they will soon revolt at being deprived of almost all their civil rights; and as they cannot become the equals of the whites, they will speedily show themselves as enemies.


Chapter XVIII.
The whole life of an American is passed like a game of chance, a revolutionary crisis, or a battle.

Chapter XVIII.
There are at the present time two great nations in the world—allude to the Russians and the Americans— All other nations seem to have nearly reached their national limits, and have only to maintain their power; these alone are proceeding—along a path to which no limit can be perceived.

Chapter XVIII.
In the United States a man builds a house to spend his latter years in it and he sells it before the roof is on. He plants a garden and lets it just as the trees are coming into bearing. He brings a field into tillage and leaves other men to gather the crops. He embraces a profession and gives it up. He settles in a place which he soon afterward leaves to carry his changeable longings elsewhere. If his private affairs leave him any leisure he instantly plunges into the vortex of politics and if at the end of a year of unremitting labour he finds he has a few days' vacation, his eager curiosity whirls him over the vast extent of the United States, and he will travel fifteen hundred miles in a few days to shake off his happiness.

They certainly are not great writers, but they speak their country's language and they make themselves heard.
Book One, Chapter XIII.

By and large the literature of a democracy will never exhibit the order, regularity, skill, and art characteristic of aristocratic literature; formal qualities will be neglected or actually despised. The style will often be strange, incorrect, overburdened, and loose, and almost always strong and bold. Writers will be more anxious to work quickly than to perfect details. Short works will be commoner than long books, wit than erudition, imagination than depth. There will be a rude and untutored vigor of thought with great variety and singular fecundity. Authors will strive to astonish more than to please, and to stir passions rather than to charm taste.
Book One, Chapter XIII.


The genius of democracies is seen not only in the great number of new words introduced but even more in the new ideas they express.


Book Two, Chapter I.
Not only does democracy make every man forget his ancestors, but also clouds their view of their descendants and isolates them from their contemporaries. Each man is for ever thrown back on himself alone, and there is danger that he may be shut up in the solitude of his own heart.

Book Two, Chapter II.
Americans of all ages, all stations of life, and all types of disposition are forever forming associations... In democratic countries knowledge of how to combine is the mother of all other forms of knowledge; on its progress depends that of all the others.

Book Two, Chapter V.
Americans combine to give fĂȘtes, found seminaries, build churches, distribute books, and send missionaries to the antipodes. Hospitals, prisons, and schools take shape in that way. Finally, if they want to proclaim a truth or propagate some feeling by the encouragement of a great example, they form an association. In every case, at the head of any new undertaking, where in France you would find the government or in England some territorial magnate, in the United States you are sure to find an association. I have come across several types of association in America of which, I confess, I had not previously the slightest conception, and I have often admired the extreme skill they show in proposing a common object for the exertions of very many and in inducing them voluntarily to pursue it.

Book Two, Chapter V.
I am far from denying that newspapers in democratic countries lead citizens to do very ill-considered things in common; but without newspapers there would be hardly any common action at all. So they mend many more ills than they cause.

Book Two, Chapter VI.
Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications, and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks on the contrary to keep them in perpetual childhood: it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness: it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances—what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living? Thus it every day renders the exercise of the free agency of man less useful and less frequent; it circumscribes the will within a narrower range, and gradually robs a man of all the uses of himself. The principle of equality has prepared men for these things: it has predisposed men to endure them, and oftentimes to look on them as benefits.

Americans cleave to the things of this world as if assured that they will never die,… They clutch everything but hold nothing fast, and so lose grip as they hurry after some new delight. An American will build a house in which to pass his old age and sell it before the roof is on; he will plant a garden and rent it just as the trees are coming into bearing; he will clear a field and leave others to reap the harvest; he will take up a profession and leave it, settle in one place and soon go off elsewhere with his changing desires. If his private business allows him a moment’s relaxation, he will plunge at once into the whirlpool of politics. Then, if at the end of a year crammed with work he has a little spare leisure, his restless curiosity goes with him traveling up and down the vast territories of the United States. Thus he will travel five hundred miles in a few days as a distraction from his happiness. Death steps in in the end and stops him before he has grown tired of this futile pursuit of that complete felicity which always escapes him. At first sight there is something astonishing in this spectacle of so many lucky men restless in the midst of abundance. But it is a spectacle as old as the world; all that is new is to see a whole people performing in it.
Book Two, Chapter XIII.


The First thing that strikes a traveler in the United States is the innumerable multitude of those who seek to emerge from their original condition; and the second is the rarity of lofty ambition to be observed in the midst of the universally ambitious stir of society. No Americans are devoid of a yearning desire to rise, but hardly any appear to entertain hopes of great magnitude or to pursue very lofty aims. All are constantly seeking to acquire property, power, and reputation.
Book Three, Chapter XIX.


What chiefly diverts the men of democracies from lofty ambition is not the scantiness of their fortunes, but the vehemence of the exertions they daily make to improve them.
Book Three, Chapter XIX.


What most astonishes me in the United States, is not so much the marvelous grandeur of some undertakings, as the innumerable multitude of small ones.


Nothing is quite so wretchedly corrupt as an aristocracy which has lost its power but kept its wealth and which still has endless leisure to devote to nothing but banal enjoyments. All its great thoughts and passionate energy are things of the past, and nothing but a host of petty, gnawing vices now cling to it like worms to a corpse.
Book Three, Chapter XI.


It is the dissimilarities and inequalities among men which give rise to the notion of honor; as such differences become less, it grows feeble; and when they disappear, it will vanish too.
Book Three, Chapter XVIII.


Commerce is naturally adverse to all the violent passions; it loves to temporize, takes delight in compromise, and studiously avoids irritation. It is patient, insinuating, flexible, and never has recourse to extreme measures until obliged by the most absolute necessity. Commerce renders men independent of each other, gives them a lofty notion of their personal importance, leads them to seek to conduct their own affairs, and teaches how to conduct them well; it therefore prepares men for freedom, but preserves them from revolutions.
Variant translation: Trade is the natural enemy of all violent passions. Trade loves moderation, delights in compromise, and is most careful to avoid anger. It is patient, supple, and insinuating, only resorting to extreme measures in cases of absolute necessity. Trade makes men independent of one another and gives them a high idea of their personal importance: it leads them to want to manage their own affairs and teaches them to succeed therein. Hence it makes them inclined to liberty but disinclined to revolution.
Book Three, Chapter XXI.


Consider any individual at any period of his life, and you will always find him preoccupied with fresh plans to increase his comfort.
Book Three, Chapter XXI.


In no other country in the world is the love of property keener or more alert than in the United States, and nowhere else does the majority display less inclination toward doctrines which in any way threaten the way property is owned.


There are two things which a democratic people will always find very difficult—to begin a war and to end it.
Book Three, Chapter XXII.


No protracted war can fail to endanger the freedom of a democratic country.
Book Three, Chapter XXII.


All those who seek to destroy the liberties of a democratic nation ought to know that war is the surest and shortest means to accomplish it.
Book Three, Chapter XXII.
Book Four



After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the government then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small, complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence: it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd.







Christian Hunter's Twitter Latest